Governor Branstad is Always Looking Forward
Member of the Washington Post Political Blog Network

How much longer do we intend to be suckers?

By Thomas E. Woods, Jr.

When Nancy Pelosi was asked where in the Constitution she found the authority for a federal health-care mandate, she replied, incredulously, “Are you serious? Are you serious?” The reporter explained that indeed he was. Pelosi simply laughed and moved on to the next question.

Scenes like this have grown commonplace in contemporary America. The only unusual aspect of the Pelosi story is that a reporter bothered to ask about the Constitution in the first place. The Constitution has ceased to play any meaningful role in the deliberations of our so-called public servants.

That may sound like hyperbole. Why, the president is still elected every four years, senators continue to serve six-year terms, and the various other procedural norms described in the Constitution are still scrupulously observed. Surely our Constitution is alive and well.

But it is not for those purposes that we need a written constitution. The British lack a written constitution, and yet the terms and functions of its various branches of government continue to operate, like ours, without innovation or disruption. The purpose of a written constitution is not to describe the structure of the government – countless governments, like the British, have maintained their traditional governmental structure without written constitutions – as it is to limit the powers that structure is to exercise.

Dishonest interpretations of the general welfare, commerce, and “necessary and proper” clauses of the Constitution have provided the bulk of our officials’ constitutional defense on those rare occasions when they are asked to provide one. These clauses do not at all mean what our overlords say they do. As I’ve shown in several of my books, there is no historical basis whatever for the so-called progressives’ interpretation of the Constitution. That’s why they have to resort to all the “living Constitution” nonsense – they realize their arguments won’t stick to the actual Constitution we have.

Meanwhile, what do we do about this? Pretty much nothing. Oh, we hold conferences. We write papers and books. We publicly deplore what is happening. And nothing changes.

We’re told to elect new people. Thanks to federal patronage, it’s almost impossible to unseat congressional incumbents. And on those rare occasions when we do, the new people soon become indistinguishable from the old people. And nothing changes.

We’re told to wait for the Supreme Court to come to the rescue – an institution that did not invalidate a single federal law on commerce-clause grounds (the federal government’s favorite catch-all justification) for nearly 60 years. Moreover, as Thomas Jefferson and James Madison reminded us, the Supreme Court is itself a branch of the federal government, and therefore not an impartial arbiter in disputes over power between the federal government and the states. Our program consists of waiting for the federal government to tell us it has behaved wrongly, and we wonder why we’re not getting anywhere?

As Jefferson warned, if the federal government is allowed to hold a monopoly on determining the extent of its own powers, we have no right to be surprised when it keeps discovering new ones. If Jefferson’s point was valid then, it is valid now.

In his famous Report of 1800, James Madison reminded Virginians and Americans at large that the judicial branch was not infallible, and that some remedy must be found for those cases in which all three branches of the federal government have exceeded their constitutional limits. If Madison’s point was valid then, it is valid now.

How much longer do we intend to be suckers? How much longer do we intend to hold conferences and give pretty speeches, as if these are the only peaceful modes of fighting back? The federal government isn’t interested in conferences and speeches. It wants victories. And it gets them, again and again. When will we do likewise? When do we intend to do something?

That is what I intend to discuss on Friday night.

Thomas E. Woods, Jr., is the New York Times bestselling author of ten books, including Meltdown: A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed, the Economy Tanked, and Government Bailouts Will Make Things Worse and The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History. Visit his website.

Please join the Republican Party of Iowa at  an event

Celebrating Our Constitution

With special guests

Congressman Ron Paul
Thomas Woods

Friday, June 25, 2010
5:30 p.m. Reception
6:30 p.m. Dinner
7:00 p.m. Program

HyVee Hall
730 3rd Street
Des Moines, Iowa

$50 per ticket
$500 per table of ten
*Delegate discount see below

For tickets click HERE

Enhanced by Zemanta

About the Author

The Iowa Republican has written 548 stories on this site.

4 Comments on “How much longer do we intend to be suckers?”

  • Jerry Glanville wrote on 21 June, 2010, 9:02

    This guy is AWESOME. If you are not reading his books you should!

  • naturallawlover wrote on 21 June, 2010, 19:58

    Jerry Glanville wrote,


    This guy is AWESOME. If you are not reading his books you should!

    Why don’t you know Jerry, if the party hack Repugnant’s at this site read Wood’s stuff, they would be shown for the RINO’s they are, and they would then have to quit bending over and grabbing their ankles for the Bumstead, Gross cabal, and instead actually stand for something besides Repugnant party politics.

    Remember, this is a Repugnant site. Not a Constitutional site. Hell, most of them can’t understand the concept that the court does not write law. They think Judaical activism is a constitutional mandate.

    All Hail Bumstead and his court jester Gross.

  • chiraven wrote on 24 June, 2010, 14:36

    Pelosi has the political instincts of a blind gekko.

    The CORRECT answer to that question is: “I’m not a constitutional lawyer, but we have had a number of them working with us throughout the crafting of this legislation. In any bill as complex as this, we will doubtless rely on many different sections of the Constitution for authority … general welfare, the commerce clause, power of taxation, and others. I am confident that if this legislation reaches the Supreme Court for review, that body will find it fully in accordance with the requirements of the Constitution of the United States.

    “Next question.”

    She should have studied her predecessor Sam Rayburn more closely. THAT’S the kind of answer that Mr. Sam would have given.

  • normb wrote on 4 July, 2010, 18:46

    I’m surprised Tom didn’t mention what Pelosi later provided regarding the Constitutionality of the Healthcare bil – which is far worse than her first replyl:
    “…the Constitution gives Congress broad power to regulate activities that have an effect on interstate commerce,” Pelosi argued. “Congress has used this authority to regulate many aspects of American life, from labor relations to education to health care to agricultural production. Since virtually every aspect of the health care system has an effect on interstate commerce, the power of Congress to regulate health care is essentially unlimited.”

    -

    UNLIMITED? Given her application of the Commerce Clause, Congress is virtually unlimited concerning anything. Joseph Story (SCOTUS 1811-1845) addressed this very issue and concluded “if this were admitted, the enumeration of the powers of Congress would be wholly unnecessary and nugatory…Agriculture, colonies, capital, machinery, the ages of labour, the profits of stock, the rents of land, the punctual performance of contracts, and the diffusion of knowledge would all be within the scope of the power; for all of them bear an intimate relation to commerce. The result would be that the powers of congress would enbrace the widest extent of legislative functions, to the utter demolition of all constitutional boundaries between the state and national governments.”

    - Sounds kinda like what we have today huh?

Write a Comment

Gravatars are small images that can show your personality. You can get your gravatar for free today!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2010 The Iowa Republican. All rights reserved.