TIR Poll: Republicans Crush Democrats in Gubernatorial Generic Ballot
- Thursday, February 11, 2010, 4:09
- Iowa, News Center, Top Story
- 1,681 views
- 10 comments
In four months, Iowa Republicans will select their candidate to run against Governor Chet Culver this fall. The last time a sitting governor was voted out of office was in 1962 when Governor Norman Erbe lost to Harold Hughes. The TIR/Concordia Group poll shows that Governor Culver has a real chance to enter the history books as the first Governor in modern history to be rejected by the voters of Iowa.
Governor Culver has struggled in every public poll that has been conducted over the past year. Culver’s polling numbers were lackluster in the TIR/Concordia Group poll, the Iowa First Foundation poll, and even the Des Moines Register’s Iowa poll. Each of these polls showed Culver losing in a head-to-head matchup with former Governor Terry Branstad. All three polls also showed Culver in serious trouble a year or more before he stands for re-election.
In July of last year, the TIR/Concordia Group poll showed that 53% of Iowans wanted a new governor. This year, the poll shows Culver is in even worse position. When asked if Culver preformed his job as Governor well enough to deserve re-election, 65% of those surveyed said no, while only 28% said that he deserved re-election.
Culver’s numbers in 2009 were bad enough that it should have raised red flags with his political advisors. Yet, while 59% of those polled in July of 2009 wanted a new governor, Culver was able to beat all of his announced Republican opponents in head-to-head matchups. The only Republican to defeat Culver in a head-to-head was former Governor Terry Branstad who was not in race at that time.
Not only did Branstad beat Culver, he beat him by a sizable margin, 16 points. At the time, Democrats in the state took issue with the poll’s findings. When the Iowa First Foundation Poll showed a similar result, Iowa Democratic Party Chairman sent out a press release warning Iowans to watch out for partisan polls. Kiernan said, “This is an interesting little gimmick…you conduct a partisan poll… whose sole purpose is to get Republicans elected, then you ask loaded questions to get your desired results.”
The only problem for Kiernan and Iowa Democrats is that the Des Moines Register’s Iowa Poll confirmed the findings of the TIR/Concordia Group and Iowa First Foundation polls. In November, the Register’s poll showed Branstad defeating Culver by 24 points, and Bob Vander Plaats topped Culver by 8 points.
In the 2010 TIR/Concordia Group poll, we decided to test the generic gubernatorial ballot. The generic ballot provides us the percentage of voters who say they intend to vote for either the Republican or the Democratic candidate for governor. Generic ballots typically present an accurate picture of the current political environment. For example, in 1994, generic ballots showed Congressional Republicans being supported by a majority of Americans, indicating that Republican would make major gains, which they ultimately did.
In the generic gubernatorial ballot, 43% of those surveyed indicated that they would vote for the Republican candidate, while only 27% would vote for the Democrat. Nine percent said neither, 20% were undecided, and one percent refused to answer.
That number spells bad news for Culver and the Democrats. Like the Register’s Iowa Poll last November, both Branstad and Vander Plaats beat Governor Culver in head-to-head matchups, but the generic ballot question indicates that any Republican would beat him in a head-to-head poll at this time.
With just ten months before the general election, Governor Culver finds himself in a difficult predicament. Not only does he need to change how he is perceived by most voters in the state, but he also has to deal with a $1 billion budget gap, high unemployment, and a sluggish economy.
While a number of political operatives and members of the media have weighed in on Governor Culver’s re-election effort, they have focused more on current events, scandals, and fundraising numbers. All of those things are tangible and will have an impact on whether or not he is re-elected, but Culver’s biggest enemy is time.
It is becoming apparent that people have already made up their minds on Governor Culver. The difficult process of balancing the state budget, which might require additional cuts, isn’t going to do anything to change people’s mind. It doesn’t matter how much money Culver can raise for his campaign or whether or not the economy starts to rebound. Culver needs more time to turn his political fortunes around, but time is the only thing that campaigns can’t buy.

About the Author
10 Comments on “TIR Poll: Republicans Crush Democrats in Gubernatorial Generic Ballot”
Write a Comment
Gravatars are small images that can show your personality. You can get your gravatar for free today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.



Obviously everyone knows Culver is in big trouble. I do think the race will be closer than people expect. Brandstad, imo, was never a beloved governor until the last year or so of his final term. The Democrats are in a position to pour a lot of money into this race.
I think if BVP wins the nomination, Culver will squeak out a win. If Culver and the Democrats have any savy they will attempt to make the Republican primary as divisive as possible to tear down Brandstad and/or alienate the social conservatives who support BVP.
The race is ours for the taking (along with the third congressional district). I just hope the Republicans run a smart campaign and don’t rest on the polls.
I think now that Vander Plaats has completely abandoned the marriage issue on the stump, social conservatives will be wary. Time will tell.
Are we going to see a TRI marriage amendment poll any time soon, or are those results not looking to good?
Are we going to see a TRI marriage amendment poll any time soon, or are those results not looking too good?
Are we going to see a TIR marriage amendment poll any time soon, or are those results not looking too good?
I would like to know more about the equality issue too.
“Equality issue”? You mean forcing school children to endure taxpayer-funded brainwashing that goes against their fundamental religious beliefs?
It’s not equality, Amber; it’s special treatment. If not, when can we expect the AEA to have workshops about the beauties of heterosexuality?
> It’s not equality, Amber; it’s special treatment.
No, it isn’t. Providing EQUAL benefits to all Iowans is EQUALITY….giving one set of benefits to a group and not another is special treatment.
As far as fundamental religious beliefs….shouldn’t you be teaching this to your children at home, or at church? And if you want to teach it at school, send your children to a private, religious-based school.
Peggy,
1. What makes you think that all those kids in that class have the exact same fundamental religious beliefs?
2. What on Earth makes you think that religion has any place in a taxpayer funded public school in the first place? I pay taxes, should I not be able to send my kids (if I had any) to a public school and not have them brainwashed into believing in creationism or that homosexuals are evil sinners?
>No, it isn’t. Providing EQUAL benefits to all Iowans is EQUALITY….giving one set of benefits to a group and not another is special treatment.
Are you saying that the opinion of the court shout now allow a Mother – Daughter ‘marriage’ contract? If not, you are not applying the opinion equally. (Before you jump off the deep end, I am talking about the legal benefits that VV and others claim come from a ‘marriage’ contract. ex – working daughter able to provide health insurance to non-working Mom.) Or are you saying that there should only be equality in those legal contracts that the government defines?