<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grassley Votes Against Motion to Proceed with Health Care Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2009/11/21/grassley-votes-against-motion-to-proceed-with-health-care-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2009/11/21/grassley-votes-against-motion-to-proceed-with-health-care-bill/</link>
	<description>News for Republicans, By Republicans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:09:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Demo</title>
		<link>http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2009/11/21/grassley-votes-against-motion-to-proceed-with-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-13138</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Demo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theiowarepublican.com/home/?p=6299#comment-13138</guid>
		<description>Gimminy Peg, nothing I do is right for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gimminy Peg, nothing I do is right for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peggy</title>
		<link>http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2009/11/21/grassley-votes-against-motion-to-proceed-with-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-13128</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theiowarepublican.com/home/?p=6299#comment-13128</guid>
		<description>I prefer beer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer beer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Demo</title>
		<link>http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2009/11/21/grassley-votes-against-motion-to-proceed-with-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-13126</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Demo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theiowarepublican.com/home/?p=6299#comment-13126</guid>
		<description>Meh, not bad Peg and pretty quickly too. I&#039;ll buy you a cup of coffee next time we run into each other at HyVee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh, not bad Peg and pretty quickly too. I&#8217;ll buy you a cup of coffee next time we run into each other at HyVee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belikebunce</title>
		<link>http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2009/11/21/grassley-votes-against-motion-to-proceed-with-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-13124</link>
		<dc:creator>belikebunce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theiowarepublican.com/home/?p=6299#comment-13124</guid>
		<description>Pretty hard to argue with the Horse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty hard to argue with the Horse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belikebunce</title>
		<link>http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2009/11/21/grassley-votes-against-motion-to-proceed-with-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-13121</link>
		<dc:creator>belikebunce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theiowarepublican.com/home/?p=6299#comment-13121</guid>
		<description>Well said Peggy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Peggy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peggy</title>
		<link>http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2009/11/21/grassley-votes-against-motion-to-proceed-with-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-13119</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theiowarepublican.com/home/?p=6299#comment-13119</guid>
		<description>CD,

In a nutshell, tax exempt status does not preclude religious institutions from entering into the political fray as long as they do not become partisan or endorse particular candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CD,</p>
<p>In a nutshell, tax exempt status does not preclude religious institutions from entering into the political fray as long as they do not become partisan or endorse particular candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peggy</title>
		<link>http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2009/11/21/grassley-votes-against-motion-to-proceed-with-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-13118</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theiowarepublican.com/home/?p=6299#comment-13118</guid>
		<description>From www.irs.gov:

The Restriction of Political Campaign Intervention by Section 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Organizations 
  
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity.  Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. 

Certain activities or expenditures may not be prohibited depending on the facts and circumstances.  For example, certain voter education activities (including presenting public forums and publishing voter education guides) conducted in a non-partisan manner do not constitute prohibited political campaign activity. In addition, other activities intended to encourage people to participate in the electoral process, such as voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives, would not be prohibited political campaign activity if conducted in a non-partisan manner.

On the other hand, voter education or registration activities with evidence of bias that (a) would favor one candidate over another; (b) oppose a candidate in some manner; or (c) have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or intervention.

The Internal Revenue Service provides resources  to exempt organizations and the public to help them understand the prohibition.  As part of its examination program, the IRS also monitors whether organizations are complying with the prohibition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.irs.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.irs.gov</a>:</p>
<p>The Restriction of Political Campaign Intervention by Section 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Organizations </p>
<p>Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity.  Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. </p>
<p>Certain activities or expenditures may not be prohibited depending on the facts and circumstances.  For example, certain voter education activities (including presenting public forums and publishing voter education guides) conducted in a non-partisan manner do not constitute prohibited political campaign activity. In addition, other activities intended to encourage people to participate in the electoral process, such as voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives, would not be prohibited political campaign activity if conducted in a non-partisan manner.</p>
<p>On the other hand, voter education or registration activities with evidence of bias that (a) would favor one candidate over another; (b) oppose a candidate in some manner; or (c) have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or intervention.</p>
<p>The Internal Revenue Service provides resources  to exempt organizations and the public to help them understand the prohibition.  As part of its examination program, the IRS also monitors whether organizations are complying with the prohibition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peggy</title>
		<link>http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2009/11/21/grassley-votes-against-motion-to-proceed-with-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-13116</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theiowarepublican.com/home/?p=6299#comment-13116</guid>
		<description>Again, the bishops are trying to protect the freedom of religion, i.e. not being forced to provide abortions in Catholic institutions.

They&#039;re not there to foist their Catholicism on others but they have every right to safeguard their beliefs.

If stripping the tax exempt status of churches means we get to voice our opinion, strip away!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, the bishops are trying to protect the freedom of religion, i.e. not being forced to provide abortions in Catholic institutions.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re not there to foist their Catholicism on others but they have every right to safeguard their beliefs.</p>
<p>If stripping the tax exempt status of churches means we get to voice our opinion, strip away!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quality Management System – Implementing the processes « Quality &#8230; &#124; Management Business Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2009/11/21/grassley-votes-against-motion-to-proceed-with-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-13111</link>
		<dc:creator>Quality Management System – Implementing the processes « Quality &#8230; &#124; Management Business Wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theiowarepublican.com/home/?p=6299#comment-13111</guid>
		<description>[...] Grassley Votes Against Motion to Proceed with Health Care Bill [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Grassley Votes Against Motion to Proceed with Health Care Bill [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Demo</title>
		<link>http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2009/11/21/grassley-votes-against-motion-to-proceed-with-health-care-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-13109</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Demo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theiowarepublican.com/home/?p=6299#comment-13109</guid>
		<description>Peggy, here&#039;s a short quote from a FOX NEWS wire report:

&quot;Success in the House came after the church ran a classic lobbying operation: deploying paid staff to Capitol Hill, tapping influential bishops to make private appeals to key congressional leaders and distributing bulletin inserts to 19,000 parishes with easy instructions — and sample wording — for sending a message to local representatives.&quot;

That kind of activity ___the church ran a classic lobbying operation: deploying paid staff to Capitol Hill, tapping influential bishops to make private appeals to key congressional leaders and distributing bulletin inserts to 19,000 parishes with easy instructions — and sample wording — for sending a message to local representatives___ is WAY beyond the legal limits of a tax-exempt entity.

Here&#039;s the URL to the entire article:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29829.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peggy, here&#8217;s a short quote from a FOX NEWS wire report:</p>
<p>&#8220;Success in the House came after the church ran a classic lobbying operation: deploying paid staff to Capitol Hill, tapping influential bishops to make private appeals to key congressional leaders and distributing bulletin inserts to 19,000 parishes with easy instructions — and sample wording — for sending a message to local representatives.&#8221;</p>
<p>That kind of activity ___the church ran a classic lobbying operation: deploying paid staff to Capitol Hill, tapping influential bishops to make private appeals to key congressional leaders and distributing bulletin inserts to 19,000 parishes with easy instructions — and sample wording — for sending a message to local representatives___ is WAY beyond the legal limits of a tax-exempt entity.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the URL to the entire article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29829.html." rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29829.html.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
