Don’t Underestimate Rick Santorum
- Friday, October 2, 2009, 7:22
- Iowa, National, News Center, Presidential, Top Story
- 1,020 views
- 8 comments
A couple days ago, Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post wrote about Rick Santorum’s upcoming trip to Iowa. Cillizza’s article was entitled, “Is Santorum Serious?” In it, he also asked the question of whether the former senator is crazy. The answer is yes, he is serious, and no, he’s not crazy.
Before Santorum made his way to the University of Dubuque to give his speech at the American Future Fund’s Conservative Lecture Series last night, he first joined a small group of people for dinner at a quaint restaurant near the Port of Dubuque. The former senator was relaxed, and the conversation weaved between topics as serious as the direction that President Obama is taking the county, to less serious matters like the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Iowa Hawkeyes trouncing of Penn State last week. Santorum didn’t spend much time on the latter.
The American Future Fund event, which was held at the University of Dubuque’s Charles and Ramona Meyers Center, was attended by over 130 people, a tremendous crowd considering that AFF didn’t use any paid advertising to drive people to the event like they did for some of their previous events. In addition to the 130 in attendance, more than 150 people watched the live stream on the AFF website.
After being introduced by University of Dubuque President Jeff Bullock, Santorum took to the stage with only the aid of a two page outline. Right out of the gate, it seemed as if Santorum called an audible. His speech was entitled, “Jumpstarting America’s Economy by Putting People First,” but he used the first ten minutes of his time talking about the nuclear situation with Iran.
Santorum, who served eight years on the on the Armed Services Committee, is also a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, a Washington think tank where he founded a program called “America’s Enemies.” Santorum is alarmed by the news that Iran has constructed a new nuclear facility. He said that we have known about the facility for over a year, and yet President Obama failed to mention it when he chaired a meeting of the United Nation’s Security Council.
In addition to being critical of President Obama and his administration, Santorum was also pretty tough on his former Republican colleagues. He chastised Republicans for passing the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). He said that he prayed that Sen. John McCain would suspend his campaign to go back to Washington to blow up the idea, something Santorum admitted McCain was good at. Yet McCain supported it, which Santorum believes lead to his defeat.
He also stated that, by supporting TARP, Republicans helped pave the way for the newly elected President Obama to expand on what Congress had already started. In essence, he said that after Republicans had opened the door to government takeover of certain businesses, President Obama was given the green light to kick the door open by bailing out the auto companies and pushing for government controlled health care.
Santorum’s speech had a populist tone, which the audience responded well to. TheIowaRepublican.com asked the people in attendance via text message what they thought about Santorum’s speech and whether or not he should run for president in 2012. Below are some of their responses.
“He definitely should run for President in 2012; he might be the best conservative answer to America’s problems.”
“Yes, but leave the religious right behind.”
“He is a great leader that is trying to explain and repair the understanding of what the government is destroying. Yes he should run in 2012 for President.”
“I sure hope he runs for President.”
All of the comments sent to TheIowaRepublican.com last night following Santorum’s speech were positive. If you doubt the seriousness with which Santorum seems to be considering a run, he didn’t come to Iowa all by himself. Accompanying him on his trip was an aide and his longtime media consultant John Brabender. He also talked warmly about the Iowa caucuses and the important roll that Iowans play in the electoral process.
Many national political pundits scoff at the notion that Santorum could be a legitimate 2012 contender. Yet, the Iowa Caucuses are tailor made for him. It’s not just because Santorum is a staunch social and fiscal conservative, but because he might be one of the most complete conservatives to run. Santorum’s focus on his national security credentials were no accident. It is the one area in which his potential primary challengers are lacking. Mitt Rommey, Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, and Tim Pawlenty all lack national security credentials.
With all of his positive attributes, Santorum still has plenty to overcome. First, there is the issue that he lost his re-election bid in 2006 by nearly 20 points. There is no doubt that 2006 was a bad year for Republicans, but such a lopsided defeat is tough to recover from. That said, we do not disqualify candidates who chose not to seek re-election because they might lose. In 2008, George Pataki and Mitt Romney fit that bill, and in 2012 Tim Pawlenty has taken a similar route.
The other issue is Santorum’s support of Arlen Specter in the 2004 primary against Pat Toomey. Some Iowa Republicans who I’ve talked to recently say that it’s a deal breaker. Either way, it will be an issue that Santorum will have to face head on if he does decide to stick his toe into Iowa’s political waters. While Santorum will have to maneuver around some major obstacles, if there is any state that would give a guy a second chance, it’s Iowa.
Special Note: The University of Dubuque campus and facilities were amazing. It’s great to see that one of our state’s private universities is thriving. One of the night’s pleasant surprises was finding out that UD’s President is an avid reader of TheIowaRepublican.com. President Jeff Bullock and his wife were gracious hosts, and after meeting them it is no surprise that the University of Dubuque is doing so well.
About the Author
8 Comments on “Don’t Underestimate Rick Santorum”
Write a Comment
Gravatars are small images that can show your personality. You can get your gravatar for free today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.



His support of the Sphincter over Toomey is a bit troubling, kinda like Branstad supporting the DEM candidate over a Republican in Nebraska several years ago(how many of you still remember that?). I think it is absolutely stupid for any elected pol. either GOP or Dem to put their thumb on the scales of a PRIMARY race!!!
He seems to be pretty solid, but we need our 2012 standard-bearer to be able to pull in votes from outside the party from(I hate to beat this to death, but….) the independents, libertarians, & conservative dems. 2010 has the potential to be a big year for the GOP, but we have got to have something to offer other than Pres. Obama is a socialist, etc. Give the voters a real alternative, run on the classic conservative issues of lower taxes, smaller gov’t, & personal freedom, then don’t abandon those values after the election like we did in 2000!!!
Run, Rick, run! I like our chances against a guy who lost re-election in his own (purple) state by more than 15 points.
DesDim: Do you really want four more years of what we have now? Tell me what part of the current crops of Dims running both DC and Iowa that you like. I can’t find one thing good they have done.
I agree desdem, rick is not the sharpest tool in the shed. Could you imagine the ticket of Palin and santorum, that would be awesome for the democrats. It could be dubbed, “dumb and dumber” run for president. Yes Deace, I will take four more years of obama over one more day of bush or any other of the social right idiots that let this country into the ground. bush and the right were a national embarassment.
Timmy, you are completely right, the repubs need to be able to reach back into the center to win, if a santorum or palin or other social conservative wins the primary, the republicans won’t win
Silence
Silence: Have you noticed the dire straights our country and state are in economically? Do you really want more of this?
Interesting that South Dakota, North Dakota, Colorado, VA and Delaware were the only states bucking the trend of increasing unemplolyment.
Throw out VA and Delaware. Those jobs are parasitic govt jobs so that leaves us with the Dakotas and CO as being the only states creating private jobs. Why? It couldn’t be their tax and regulation codes could it?
Iowa Dims hate business. They want to heap more power on unions and tax business more as well as heap on more regulations.
Silence, one has to be extremely stupid to believe this is the way to grow an economy.
I want everyone of those RATS out of office. Their time is up. We’ll be paying the price for this for a very long time.
Deace, did you happen to notice who caused it, it was your friendly neighborhood republicans, Bush was in charge and we were just coming off of 6 years of republican control of congress, trying to blame democrats for this is insane and stupid. Also hypocritical because you repbublicans wanted to blame clinton for 8 years of an inept bush white house.
Silence
After seeing Sen. Santorum in person at the Iowa RTL event yesterday, this is someone I am interested in hearing a lot more from. He is a very impressive speaker.
A good speaker does not make a good President. We’ve got to re-discover the GOP’s core principles first and convince the voters that this time dammit, we are gonna stick to ‘em!!!