Bruce Braley Supports a Ground Zero Mosque
Member of the Washington Post Political Blog Network

399 to 1: King lone opposition vote to slavery bill

stevekingiaOn Tuesday Congressman Steve King cast the lone vote against a marker to be placed in the new visitor center, Emancipation Hall, to pay tribute to slaves who helped build the Capitol Building. King, who never fails to have logic and reason behind his actions, will surely get some serious backlash from this vote. Luckily for me, Constitution Daily is on the press contact lists for Latham and King and was emailed a link to King’s interview on the Scott Voorhees show on KFAB Radio out of Omaha. You can listen to the segment by clicking here. It is about 10 minutes long.

In short though, King based his opposition vote on past actions taken by the Capitol architect and the liberal left. King said that for years he and others have been fighting the Capitol architect on the religious engravings and inscriptions in the House Chamber. King said the architect has been “scrubbing away any sign of Christianity or religious faith.” And since the Democrats wanted this bill passed they had to make a deal to also recognize religion by engraving the phrase “In God we trust” and The Pledge of Allegiance to the walls of the visitor center. King takes that as a slap in the face. King said, “I’m not fine with using this as a lever, a quid quo pro, in order to make any acknowledgement to Christianity, which has been a central core of American history.”

The interview goes on to talk about equal protection, the Congressional Black Caucus, and Martin Luther King, Jr. Congressman King stated, “I’m more consistent with Martin Luther King, Jr. than many members of the Congressional Black Caucus and I think that’s a fact. It’s not even debatable.” King wrapped it up with what I think is a great quote summing up the conservative thought process toward affirmative action and equal opportunity, “I want equal opportunity. I don’t want preferences for anybody, and that includes me.”

Since this vote will be used against King in the Des Moines Register, Sioux City Journal, opponent’s campaign materials, and everything else, I thought now would be a good time to thank King for taking principled votes no matter the outcomes. From voting against Katrina aid to standing up against Bush’s bailout plan, King has always voted with his conscience. Conservatives don’t have to worry about King casting the right vote when the pressure is on. They can save that worry for other Republicans in and around our state.

I do have to admit, I’m really anxious to see this play out in the press and blogosphere. Votes like these bring out the crazies and it should be an entertaining show.

About the Author

Constitution Daily has written 97 stories on this site.

An Iowa based blog with the purpose of giving incentive to those actively engaged in conservative causes. Content will include Iowa and national issues ranging from politics to everyday society, but in every case you will know where Constitution Daily stands. Please feel free to contact me anytime at constitutiondaily@gmail.com.

6 Comments on “399 to 1: King lone opposition vote to slavery bill”

  • Deace voted for Obama wrote on 9 July, 2009, 6:41

    God bless Congressman King–a rare gem.

  • Timmy wrote on 9 July, 2009, 7:25

    I’d like to know who the 35 congresscritters were that took the principled stand of not voting.

  • Jeff wrote on 9 July, 2009, 8:11

    I like Steve King, but I’m not sure about this one. My dad always told me to pick my battles. I’m not sure this is one I’d pick. Christianity is not in danger of irrelevance because of government, or even this action. I mean, we already have “In God We Trust” on every piece of currency. That would be a battle worth fighting, not this one.

    I think he had the right intention here, but people only know what they here. And most voters won’t hear his side. They’ll only hear that he voted against recognizing the contributions of slaves. Oh well, the election isn’t til next year, so most voters will likely forget about this faux paus.

  • HawkCR1 wrote on 9 July, 2009, 13:48

    Jeff,

    Its a principled stand.. what’s next? Are we going to order that words “In God We Trust” be removed from the Washington Monument and off our currency?

    If many of these liberals had their way…they’d do just that…

    Didn’t hear a word from the liberal media calling out Dave Loebsack for his “present” vote on the resolution supporting the Iranian demonstrators a couple of weeks back…. Loebsack was the only one gutless enough not to take a position either for or against it….

  • Deace voted for Obama wrote on 9 July, 2009, 14:13

    The 32 NO votes:

    Aderholt
    Barrett (SC)
    Bean
    Blunt
    Broun (GA)
    Burton (IN)
    Childers
    Conyers
    Deal (GA)
    Delahunt
    Ellsworth
    Fallin
    Garrett (NJ)
    Gohmert
    Grijalva
    Gutierrez
    Hall (NY)
    Hensarling
    Inglis
    Jackson-Lee (TX)
    Johnson, E. B.
    Kissell
    Melancon
    Mica
    Miller (NC)
    Payne
    Rogers (KY)
    Rohrabacher
    Sestak
    Speier
    Westmoreland
    Wexler

  • Deace voted for Obama wrote on 9 July, 2009, 14:13

    Sorry for the confusion. I should have said those not voting.

Write a Comment

Gravatars are small images that can show your personality. You can get your gravatar for free today!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2010 The Iowa Republican. All rights reserved.