“I was an early advocate of a no-fly zone. Today, despite the President’s delay in offering this help, the Libyan opposition has made progress in defending itself against the brutality of Gadhafi, thanks to the strength and capability of U.S. military forces.
“The burden remains on the President to convey how he sees the mission of the United States going forward. What is the long-term commitment of the United States in supporting the effort that now is NATO led? If America’s armed forces are put in harm’s way, what is the objective, if not regime change? How long does President Obama envision our involvement, should Gadhafi hold on?
“It’s unclear when our involvement will end and under what terms. Debate in our system of government is necessary. Congress needs to be involved regarding the way that the United States is to continue making a commitment to this military action. The President needs to speak with the kind of passion that shows that America is credible as a world leader, and the speech didn’t go as far as it should have to do that.”
blog comments powered by Disqus