The Iowa House of Representatives passed a bill that would establish a dove hunting season yesterday. The bill passed 58 to 39. The Senate passed a bill allowing the hunting of Doves the day before and Governor Branstad has indicated that he would sign the legislation in into law if it reaches his desk.
During the House debate, Rep. Mary Masher of Iowa City, proposed a number of amendments, but none of were approved. Masher, who is an unabashed advocate of abortion rights, fought desperately to protect the life of the mourning dove.
Masher was deeply concerned about what a hunting season would do to the life span of Iowa doves and the overall dove population in the state. One of Masher’s amendments would have stipulated that a dove hunting season would not be allowed until 90 days after crops were harvested.
Masher was concerned that a dove would digest the lead contained in a shotgun shell, which could cause it to die. She noted that doves incubate their eggs continually, stating that the male does a daytime shift and the female does the night shift. Thus, eliminating the lead shot during a time in which they are likely to feed would protect the squab by protecting both of its parents.
It was odd to hear someone like Masher rise in support of life in the Iowa House. It’s just too bad she only takes that position when it’s about a bird instead of the life of an unborn child.
Because the dove hunting provision was attached to a senate bill dealing with raccoon hunting, Masher, and fellow Democrat, Rep. Mary Gaskill, were also upset that the people of Iowa were not allowed to weigh in on the issue in a separate public hearing. Masher cried out, “This is not how you treat Iowa people, they have a right to have their say. That wasn’t allowed to them by this chamber.”
Masher then warned the majority party that the people of Iowa would not stand for behavior like this and it could cost them their re-election. If one didn’t know better, you would think that Masher and Gaskill would have supported the concept of letting the people of Iowa voting on the issue of marriage since the people of Iowa were not allowed a say on that matter either. Oh well.
Dove – The Other White Meat
Rep. Abdul Samad, a Democrat for Des Moines, asked the bill manager, Rep. Richard Arnold, why anyone would want to hunt a mourning dove, since there is no meat on the animal. He then claimed that the true intent of the bill was to provide hunters with a difficult bird to shoot. Rep. Samad also mentioned that he was a bird owner as well as a vegetarian.
Rep. Arnold dismissed Samad’s notion by saying that there was nothing better than grilling six dove breast wrapped in bacon and serving them on a bed of rice. Later in the debate Rep. Clel Baudler added that mourning dove, “taste awfully good.” The two Republicans added that they have not hunted doves in Iowa.
The Governor is in the House?
After the dove-hunting bill passed, Governor Branstad caused a commotion when he entered the chamber. Branstad came to chamber to thank the House for supporting the resolution that will place a statue of Dr. Norman Borlaug in the United State’s capitol. Since the House was debating the dove hunting bill, house leaders could not attend the bill signing. The Governor also took the opportunity to tell the house that he will sign the dove hunting bill, much to Rep. Masher’s chagrin.
Why are you reporting on dove hunting?
I went to the capitol to cover the Government Oversight Committee’s vote on House File 5. The committee met at noon, but both Republicans and Democrats in the committee caucused, and the Democrats didn’t come back until hour-ling block was up. So, instead of leaving the capitol and coming back, I stuck around, and dove hunting was the topic of the day.
blog comments powered by Disqus